Here is another way to see this more clearly.
Say someone is a serial rapist and murderers. We are cautious over whether we should put that one vermin to death.
تاہم, there is a fate far worse than death. It’s called extinction.
And we liberally hand out that penalty to our most productive member of the societies.
There are so many laws that artificially increase costs of reproduction for the productive. Those laws are strong enough that the diligent and productive actually make less children than the lazy. Their wealth don’t matter because those are spent to financially support children of their conquerors and enslavers, the majestic welfare kings and queens.
There are tons of horror stories of men losing all his fairly earned wealth due to marriage. Yes, those men agreed to get married. Almost nobody would agree to such nonsense deals if alternatives are legal easy and simple.
Not to mention income tax that punish the diligent so welfare parasites can breed and breed more parasites to loot the hard workers’ money.
Other method of reproductions are blocked too. Many women don’t mind getting just sperms if the men are very smart. Yet we have restriction. The only way women can do that is if the sperm donor is anonymous. If not, he is liable for child support.
With that kind of morality, that is so cautious over a mere death of one vermin and yet so easy and liberal when it comes to penalizing victimless acts, I saw no hope for any morality at all.
If that is right, nothing is wrong.
is a post from: فری مارکیٹ ہمیشہ